Showing posts sorted by relevance for query ICO. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query ICO. Sort by date Show all posts

ICO gives site operators a year to comply with new cookie law



Website operators have a year to change the way they use cookies to comply with new laws, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has said. Those that make no effort to change could still face sanctions, though, the ICO said. From tomorrow, UK laws based on the EU's Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive will force websites to obtain users' consent in order to store cookies. Cookies are small text files that record user activity on websites. The ICO, the UK's data protection regulator, has given most operators of consumer websites a year's grace before serious enforcement of the new laws will begin. "Although there isn’t a formal transitional period in the Regulations, the government has said they don’t expect the ICO to enforce this new rule straight away," Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner, said in a statement. "So we’re giving businesses and organisations up to one year to get their house in order. This does not let everyone off the hook. Those who choose to do nothing will have their lack of action taken into account when we begin formal enforcement of the rules," Graham said. The ICO said it was allowing the exemption period because there was no adequate technical solution within browser settings to obtain user consent to cookies. The Government has said it is working with browser manufacturers to establish a new system for gaining user consent through their settings. "Browser settings giving individuals more control over cookies will be an important contributor to a solution," said Graham. The ICO said it would respond to complaints about cookies during the exemption period by advising website owners how to comply with the new Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, an ICO guide on how it will enforce the regulations said. "[The Information Commissioner] will provide advice to the organisation concerned on the requirements of the law and how they might comply," the ICO enforcement guide (7-page / 132KB PDF) said. "Where he considers it appropriate, and particularly as May 2012 approaches, he will also ask organisations to explain to him the steps they are taking to ensure that they will in fact be in a position to comply by May 2012," the guide said. The ICO recently published guidance on how organisations can comply with the new regulations. It suggested a variety of options websites could use to gain user consent, including prompting users with pop-up questions about their consent to cookies or writing cookie consent into terms and conditions users have to agree to when registering with a site. Website features, such as videos, that remember how users personalise their interaction, could also determine user consent, the ICO said. The Information Commissioner said the ICO website now operates a header giving users the choice how to manage their cookies but said that it may not be an appropriate solution for other websites. "We’ve decided to place a header bar on our website giving users information about the cookies we use and choices about how to manage them," Christopher Graham said in the ICO press release. "I am not saying that other websites should necessarily do the same. Every website is different and prescriptive and universal ‘to do’ lists would only hinder rather than help businesses to find a solution that works best for them and their customers," Graham said. Under the new UK regulations the ICO has been given extra powers to impose penalties of up to £500,000 on websites that breach the new regulations, the ICO enforcement guide says. The ICO can also investigate the measures taken by website providers to safeguard the security of public electronic communications, investigate and fine websites depending on how they deal with personal data breaches and can demand information about users to investigate how a website complies with the new regulations, the ICO enforcement guide says. "Along with the power to impose financial penalties on telecoms and internet companies who fail to notify us about their data breaches, we will also have stronger powers to investigate the businesses behind nuisance marketing calls and spam texts," Christopher Graham, Information Commissioner, said in the ICO press release. "Tackling the businesses that make money from this is a challenge, but these new powers will give us access to more of the information we need to do the job," Graham said. 

SHARE OUR NEWS DIRECTLY ON SOCIAL NETWORKS:-

Greater Manchester Police Fined £150,000 By ICO For Using Unencrypted USB Sticks

Greater Manchester Police Fined £150,000 By ICO For Using Unencrypted USB Sticks 

To fight against major security breaches, data loss, cyber theft, and many other cyber challenges, both Government and higher authorities are becoming as tight and strict as they can. While sitting at edge of cyber security, not even a single mistake or carelessness will be negotiated. So either you have to deliver your very best, or you have to penalty, exactly the same thing happened to Greater Manchester Police. Yesterday, I mean 16th of October The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) in the UK recently fined the Greater Manchester Police £150,000 for a data breach. In their press release ICO said - Greater Manchester Police force is being fined for failing to take appropriate measures against the loss of personal data. The action was prompted by the theft of a memory stick containing sensitive personal data from an officer’s home. The device, which had no password protection, contained details of more than a thousand people with links to serious crime investigations. The ICO found that a number of officers across the force regularly used unencrypted memory sticks, which may also have been used to copy data from police computers to access away from the office. Despite a similar security breach in September 2010, the force had not put restrictions on downloading information, and staff were not sufficiently trained in data protection.
The findings prompted the Information Commissioner to use his powers under the Data Protection Act to impose a Civil Monetary Penalty of £150,000. Greater Manchester Police paid that penalty yesterday, taking advantage of a 20 per cent early payment discount (£120,000). 

David Smith, ICO Director of Data Protection, said: -“This was truly sensitive personal data, left in the hands of a burglar by poor data security. The consequences of this type of breach really do send a shiver down the spine. “It should have been obvious to the force that the type of information stored on its computers meant proper data security was needed. Instead, it has taken a serious data breach to prompt it into action.
“This is a substantial monetary penalty, reflecting the significant failings the force demonstrated. We hope it will discourage others from making the same data protection mistakes.” 
The monetary penalty is paid into the Treasury’s Consolidated Fund and is not kept by the Commissioner.   






SHARE OUR NEWS DIRECTLY ON SOCIAL NETWORKS:-

Anonymous Bring Down The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)

Anonymous Bring Down The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Official Site
Hacktivist group Anonymous continuing massive denial of service of attack on the data protection watchdog's website. The tweets, which were published by the @UKAnonymous2012 account, claim the attack is part of a protest by the group at the handling of the Leveson Inquiry.  Incidentally, the Leveson Inquiry’s website has also been the target of DDoS attacks by Anonymous this week.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has confirmed that it’s still dealing with the fallout from a suspected Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack on its website.In a statement sent to IT Pro, the data watchdog said access to the site has been disrupted over the last several days because of the attack. “The website itself has not been damaged, but people have been unable to access it. We provide a public facing website which contains no sensitive information,” the statement said. “We regret this disruption to our service and we are working to bring the website back online as soon as possible.” 
Like ICO couple of weeks ago we have seen similar attack on the official website of UK's Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) that time also the experts suspected that Anonymous was behind the attack and the reason of that hack was to protest Supreme Court's decession on blocking The Pirate Bay in UK.





-Source (IT Pro)



SHARE OUR NEWS DIRECTLY ON SOCIAL NETWORKS:-

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...